Dangote Refinery recently started production of diesel in April 2024.
However, the company claims that it struggles to sell about 29 tankers of diesel per day due to low patronage from Nigerian oil marketers.
Devakumar V.G. Edwin, Vice President of Dangote Group Limited, revealed this during a space discussion on X on Wednesday.
Also Read:
- NNPCL Petrol Price For September 2024, Update Adjusts Distribution Cost
- Dangote Refinery Ready To Produce 54 million Litres of Petroleum Per Day
- Major Oil Marketers Waiting For Dangote Refinery For Petroleum Products Supply
- Fire outbreak at Dangote Refinery amid 'dirty fuel' controversy with IOCs, oil marketers
Local marketers boycotting Dangote Refinery Diesel
He disclosed that although the refinery endeavours to provide reasonably priced petroleum products, numerous Nigerian traders have declined to purchase from the refinery, opting to continue importing diesel from overseas.
“The whole purpose of doing this refinery in Nigeria was to utilize our local crude instead of exporting raw materials and importing finished products,” he explained. “We should be able to refine and use the finished products within Nigeria and produce more to export the surplus,” he stated.
This reveals that marketers purchase only 3% of Dangote Refinery diesel due to its lower pricing.
Foreign markets have access to the remaining 97% due to the ignorance of local marketers.
“I’m selling 2 to 3% to small traders who are willing to buy, while the rest 95 to 97% I’m forced to export,” The vice president spoke on the quantity of the refinery’s products sold locally. Devakumar claims that Dangote Refinery endeavours to sell diesel at N1,000 despite an exchange rate of about N1.600 to the naira while marketers are selling imported diesel for N1,700.

What could this mean? Dangote Refinery and Endless Riddles
Devakumar’s claim is another in a long series of allegations, counter allegations and hard to decode contradictory press statements from Dangote Refinery, Nigerian oil marketers, the Nigerian government and the Nigeria National Petroleum Company Limited (NNPLC). Dangote Refinery announced the commencement of the production of Premium Motor Spirit (PMS), commonly known as petrol, in early September 2024 and announced that the sole off taker or buyer for its petrol would be the NNPCL. Only for the NNPLC to release a counter press statement denying that the state-owned oil company would be sole off-takers for petroleum from the Dangote Refinery.
The NNPLC also made a bizarre “clarification”in its statement that it would buy petroleum from Dangote Refinery only if Dangote’s price is lower than the “pump price in Nigeria”. How could the NNPLC trumpet the deregulation of the market and the transition to a regime of market prices while also expecting Dangote Refinery’s petroleum to be cheaper than “the pump price in Nigeria” i.e a price that is about 50% subsidised?
Devakumar’s claims continue the series of claims, counterclaims, and odd twists and turns. The Vice President of Dangote Group Limited did not explain why Nigerian oil marketers ,who had accused the Dangote Refinery of wanting to institute a monopoly in the downstream sector, would refuse to buy diesel from a domestic refinery that is 60% cheaper than imported diesel. He had earlier accused the oil marketers of importing “dirty fuels” i.e. diesel with dangerously high sulphur content.
It is unlikely that any “dirty diesel” import would be 60% cheaper, despite shipping costs, than Dangote diesel. International business news media like Bloomberg have reported that diesel exports from Dangote Refinery is displacing diesel imports from Europe in West Africa. It is hence difficult to understand what Devakumar was complaining about. Is the Dangote business so patriotic it prefers earning naira to dollars? Industry watchers and Nigerians hope that Dangote Refinery and the Government/NNPLC will soon put an end to the long-running drama.

A Commercial Explanation of Why Local Marketers are “Boycotting” Dangote Refinery Diesel
There seems to be a simple commercial explanation of local marketers’ reluctance to purchase Dangote Refinery diesel. The core issue, according to oil and gas expert Ademola H. Adigun, lies in the refinery’s stringent pricing, payment terms, and business model, which do not align with the realities of Nigeria’s downstream sector.
One major problem is the refinery’s cash-only sales model. Unlike the international petroleum market, which often includes credit and financing options, Dangote Refinery requires buyers to pay upfront in U.S. dollars through letters of credit (LC) with no financing alternatives. This is particularly challenging for Nigerian marketers who typically operate on narrow margins and depend heavily on credit to manage their purchases. Adigun points out, “No marketer will work for nothing,” underscoring the difficulty of this model for local businesses.
The refinery’s terms disproportionately favour foreign traders, as noted by Adigun. Dealers in Lomé, Togo, can buy fuel in bulk from Dangote Refinery and pay in U.S. dollars. These traders then resell the fuel to Nigerian marketers, often at higher prices due to added credit costs and exchange rate fluctuations. Consequently, Nigerian marketers find themselves paying more for fuel purchased through these intermediaries, as the refinery’s direct sales terms are too rigid to accommodate.
Public feedback reflects these issues. Observers have criticized the refinery’s strict cash-only policy and high prices, which force Nigerian marketers to buy through foreign traders who offer better payment terms but at a premium. This not only increases costs for consumers but also undermines the refinery’s goal of reducing Nigeria’s dependency on imported petroleum. It also seems that these Lomé-based big oil traders have a longer history and hence better knowledge of their counterparties i.e. the Nigerian oil marketers than Dangote Refinery who is new in the business.
To address these challenges, several potential solutions have been proposed. Enhancing access to financing for local marketers is one key strategy. Banks could play a crucial role by offering better credit lines and financial support to help marketers meet the Dangote Refinery’s stringent payment terms.
Adigun highlights that profit margins are already slim for local oil marketers. Unless the Dangote Refinery provides innovative financing or credit terms to reflect market realities, local marketers will continue to reimport its diesel from Lomé to the detriment of Nigerian homes and businesses who are needlessly paying an additional N700 per litre for diesel. The situation seems a commercial challenge for Nigeria’s banks to solve rather than another market-distorting government intervention. Under the guidance of Nigerian lenders, local markets may undergo a consolidation that will see the rise of major players who have the technical and financing capacity of the Lomé oil marketers.
The Dangote Group tends to present every commercial challenge, some of it of its own making, as a conspiracy by the international oil majors or powerful local cabals to make its $20 billion refinery fail. The Dangote Refinery, the largest in Africa and the largest single train refinery in the world, enjoys enormous public support in a nation that has depended on imported refined petroleum products for almost three decades. It has failed to steer this enormous national backing towards support for a deregulated sector free of government price controls and subsidy which seems to be ultimately in its interest.