Dr. Sam Amadi: Edo Governorship Elections Tribunal Ruling a representation of the challenges facing Nigeria’s electoral system

Director of The Abuja School of Social and Political Thought (TAS), Dr. Sam Amadi, has stated that the Edo governorship election tribunal decision to dismiss the petition filed by the PDP candidate, Asue Ighodalo is a representation of the challenges facing Nigeria’s electoral system.

Sharing these sentiments in a press conference held on Monday, TAS noted that the case raises important legal and procedural questions that deserve closer examination to enhance future electoral processes. It further referenced concerns previously raised by civil society organizations and election observers, including reports of inconsistencies in result documentation and voting procedures in certain polling units.

Edo State Governorship Election Petition Tribunal Judgement

On April 2, 2025, a three-member tribunal, led by Justice Wilfred Kpochi, upheld the election of Governor Monday Okpebholo of the All Progressives Congress (APC), dismissing petitions filed by the Peoples Democratic Party (PDP) and its candidate, Asue Ighodalo, as well as those from the Action Alliance (AA) and Accord Party.​ It ruled that the petitioners failed to provide sufficient evidence to substantiate claims of electoral irregularities, including over-voting and non-compliance with the Electoral Act.

TAS Response

Responding to the judgement TAS emphasized that the group’s interest in the 2024 Edo governorship election is rooted in its commitment to strengthening democratic institutions and fostering electoral transparency.

“This isn’t about any political party. It is about ensuring that the electoral process remains credible and inspires confidence among Nigerian voters,” Dr. Amadi stated.

“We have reviewed some observations suggesting a need for more clarity and consistency in the results process. These are important issues that deserve attention,” TAS noted.

TAS also cited concerns related to Section 73(2) of the Electoral Act, which addresses the documentation of voting materials. The group emphasized that adherence to such provisions helps reinforce the integrity of the electoral process.

“Legal safeguards such as these are essential to maintaining public trust in the voting process,” the group said.

Additionally, the organization commented on the tribunal’s treatment of evidence from BVAS machines and result sheets, suggesting that future proceedings should give more room for clarity and transparency when digital evidence is involved.

“A more thorough demonstration of the BVAS data could help build public trust and ensure transparency,” TAS added.

Calls For Greater Transparency in Future Elections

TAS called for greater transparency and adherence to electoral procedures in future elections, highlighting the need for continued reform and improved legal interpretation of electoral laws.

“Edo 2024 should serve as a case study to strengthen future elections. Voter confidence is central to the health of our democracy.”

The group concluded by calling for broader dialogue on electoral integrity, noting the importance of collaborative efforts by stakeholders to safeguard Nigeria’s democratic future.

“We believe in the rule of law and democratic governance. A national conversation on electoral integrity is vital for sustaining Nigeria’s democracy.”

Subscribe to Notifications