Bybit Closes NFT Marketplace, Inscription, and IDO Services

On April 1, 2025,Bybit, a top cryptocurrency exchange, has shut down its NFT Marketplace, Inscription, and IDO (Initial DEX Offering) services. The action is an unprecedented retreat from the platform’s earlier forays into becoming a one-stop-shop for digital assets, including non-fungible tokens (NFTs). As the crypto market continues to evolve, Bybit’s closure serves as a harbinger of greater trends and issues in the crypto and NFT markets.

Why It Closed

1. Decreasing NFT Market Viability

The NFT market has performed poorly in recent years, and this arguably was the reason behind Bybit’s closure. According to a 2024 review by NFTPlazas, the NFT market experienced a drastic decline in floor prices and trading volumes in 2023, driven by a general decline in the cryptocurrency market. The fall was triggered by decreased investor confidence and heightened regulatory scrutiny, which made NFT marketplaces less profitable. Bybit’s NFT Marketplace, where users could buy, sell, and exchange NFTs on blockchains like Ethereum and Solana, may not have been able to generate sustainable revenue in this environment. The shutdown is one part of a larger trend of consolidation among NFT marketplaces, as businesses reassess their role in a cooling market.

2. Regulatory Pressures and Compliance Challenges

Regulatory uncertainty has long been a challenge for the NFT market, and Bybit’s closure might be a result of these pressures. NFTPlazas points out that the NFT market continues to be in a regulatory limbo, with legal uncertainties affecting market confidence. This is similar to the fate of other platforms, such as Kraken, which shut down its NFT marketplace in November 2024. InsideBitcoins reports that Kraken’s action was necessitated by increased regulatory pressure, particularly following the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) sending a Wells notice to OpenSea for hosting illicit securities in the form of NFTs. Bybit, as a centralized exchange, likely had the same costs of compliance, e.g., having to implement KYC (Know Your Customer) processes on NFT trades, which would have introduced operating costs and complexity, making the marketplace less viable.

3. Strategic Refocusing on Core Operations

Bybit’s decision to close down its NFT Marketplace, Inscription, and IDO services could also be as a result of strategic refocusing on its core operations, e.g., spot and futures trading. InsideBitcoins cited the same rationale in the closure of Kraken, whose exchange wanted to transfer funds to “new and brighter projects” in its network. As a major crypto exchange itself, Bybit may have reasoned that its NFT-related services were not generating sufficient returns compared to its core trading operations. This step points to a broader trend in the crypto space, wherein centralized exchanges are prioritizing profitability and scalability rather than experimentation ventures like NFTs and IDOs.

4. Market Saturation and Competition

The segment of the market for NFTs is highly competitive with the established players like OpenSea dominating the scene despite having problems of their own. InsideBitcoins pointed out that Blur outpaced Magic Eden and OpenSea in the volume of daily NFT sales in 2024, which was a rapidly changing competitive landscape. Bybit’s NFT Marketplace may not have achieved significant market share in this oversaturated space, especially as newer sites brought new features to attract consumers. Further, overall declines in trading volumes in the NFT arena, noted by NFTPlazas, likely exacerbated the competitive pressures in these further contributing to difficulty by which Bybit could invest more in its suite of NFTs.

Influence on the Crypto Market

1. Consolidation in NFT Markets Faster

Bybit’s shutdown is part of an overarching narrative trend of consolidation for the NFT space that has seen mature-market-only strongest surviving platforms remain. CoinDesk similarly observed a trend with Coinbase NFT, which paused its creator Drops feature in February 2023 to focus on other aspects of its marketplace due to shutdown rumors. Bybit’s NFT Marketplace shutdown follows other exchanges like Kraken, which exited the NFT marketplace in 2024. This merger is able to cause a concentrated NFT marketplace with top performers like OpenSea and Blur intact and smaller or less profitable sites unable to cope.

2. Potential Sogginess in Confidence of NFT Sector

Bybit’s suspension of its NFT-linked offerings can go some way toward creating sogginess in the NFT sector as it currently is, having declining prices and trade volumes to deal with. NFTPlazas said that during crypto bear markets, bearishness induces lower liquidity and increased downward pressure on NFT prices. Bybit’s withdrawal may be evidence favoring this bearishness because it means even established exchanges are withdrawing from the NFT market. While Bybit’s main trading business is not affected, the closure may make investors and creators more reluctant to engage with NFT platforms, thereby decelerating innovation and adoption in the sector.

3. Shift Towards Decentralized NFT Platforms

Bybit’s closure may accelerate a shift towards decentralized NFT marketplaces, which offer greater immunity against the weaknesses of centralized platforms. A piece by Synodus 2024 pointed out that decentralized NFT marketplaces built using blockchain technology provide open, secure, and tamper-free transactions and thereby a safer bet for those centralized markets such as Bybit’s. While centralised exchanges shut down shop for NFT buying and selling, clients may increasingly be found going towards decentralized markets more and more, creating increasingly decentralized infrastructure for NFT trading. This shift could spark long-term creativity, albeit despite the temporary disturbance for customers adapted to centralized hubs.

4. Impact on Small NFT Initiatives and Writing Services

Smaller NFT initiatives and services affiliated with Bybit’s Writing services may also lose heavily subsequent to the shut down. Bybit’s system provided exposure and liquidity for such projects, and their withdrawal can cause them scrambling for alternative hubs. InsideBitcoins also noticed a similar problem with Kraken’s closure, citing the potential impact on NFT holders who utilized the service to exchange. For Inscription-based services, where information is placed into blockchains like Bitcoin, the closure could slow innovation in this area, as artists lose a significant way of initiating a project and promoting it.

5. A Sign of a Ripening Crypto Market

Bybit’s action indicates a broader shift in the crypto community: toward profitability and maturity. NFTPlazas pointed out that the NFT market’s challenges, such as environmental concerns and regulatory certainty, require sustainable answers to support long-term growth. Bybit’s retreat from the NFT market means that the industry is exiting the speculative bubble of 2021 and heading toward more stable business models. Centralized exchanges are increasingly focused on core services with stable revenues such as staking and trading, rather than on the test assets like NFTs and IDOs. This shift could lead to more focused innovation in the crypto sector, as capital goes towards areas where there is greater potential for increase.

Subscribe to Notifications