In Nigeria’s booming tech scene, weak intellectual property contracts could leave innovators cut out of the fortunes they help create.
In 2013, Stanford student Reggie Brown was forced out of Snapchat, the app he co-created based on his idea for disappearing photos. Years later, after a bruising legal fight, he walked away with $157.5 million. A staggering sum—until you compare it with the billions the company went on to generate.
The difference boiled down to one thing: the intellectual property (IP) clause—or lack of one—that determined who owned the upside.
This cautionary tale was recently highlighted in a post by commercial lawyer Anjola Ige, who broke down how “standard” IP clauses can quietly strip creators of control over their innovations. Her analysis has resonance far beyond Stanford dorm rooms. For Nigerian tech founders and startups, where contracts are often signed under pressure or with limited legal review, the risks are enormous.
Nigeria’s Tech Boom, Nigeria’s Legal Weak Spot
Nigeria’s start-up ecosystem is surging. Between 2015 and 2022, Nigerian tech companies raised more than $4.4 billion in venture capital, producing unicorns like Flutterwave, Andela, and Interswitch. Founders are scaling products across Africa, exporting ideas globally, and increasingly competing for international investment.
But legal protection often lags behind innovation. In Nigeria, contracts are frequently signed under pressure or based on templates that fail to distinguish between different categories of intellectual property. The risk is simple: a careless clause could mean surrendering a billion-dollar idea for a one-time fee.
As the headline warns, start-up founders beware: boilerplate IP clauses can cost you a fortune.
The Trap in “Standard” Clauses
Most boilerplate IP clauses look harmless:
“Client shall exclusively own all right, title and interest in and to all Deliverables, including all Intellectual Property Rights therein.”
But that one line can swallow everything—pre-existing IP, proprietary methods, trade secrets, and even future innovations. In Brown’s case, the absence of clarity around ownership meant his original idea could be absorbed into the company without lasting equity or control.
For Nigerian innovators, the same scenario could arise with a prototype developed for a client, a pitch deck refined with an external consultant, or a feature built by a contract engineer.
Smarter Strategies for Protecting IP
Drawing from Ige’s framework, two safeguards stand out:
1. Inventory Your IP
Before signing anything, founders should classify intellectual property into four buckets:
-
Background IP: What you had before the deal
-
Foreground IP: What you create specifically for this project
-
Derivative IP: Improvements on your existing IP
-
Joint IP: Genuine collaborative work
This prevents contracts from sweeping away assets that were never meant to be part of the bargain.
2. Negotiate Value, Not Just Rights
Flat-fee IP transfers are common in Nigeria, but they leave innovators with nothing beyond the initial payment. Smarter agreements include revenue sharing, milestone payments, or even equity stakes—ensuring creators share in future upside.
Why It Matters Now
As Nigeria positions itself as Africa’s digital powerhouse, the gap between innovation and legal protection is widening. Global investors are entering the ecosystem, and Nigerian products are reaching international markets. Without airtight contracts, many local innovators could find themselves written out of their own success stories.
The lesson is clear: don’t let a boilerplate clause decide your future. In tech, the law is as important as the code.