CBN Cracks Down on Bank Directors with Insider Loans: A Precedent for Stronger Corporate Governance?

The Central Bank of Nigeria (CBN) has taken a bold step in tightening corporate governance within the banking sector, issuing a directive that mandates bank directors with non-performing insider-related loans to resign immediately. This move, part of a broader push for transparency, aims to curb financial mismanagement and protect depositors from excessive risk-taking by senior executives.

The new directive, signed by the Acting Director of Banking Supervision, Adetona Adedeji, also requires banks to bring all insider-related facilities within regulatory limits within 180 days. Insider loans credit extended to a bank’s executives, board members, or major shareholders are capped at 5% of the bank’s paid-up capital for individual directors and 10% for total insider-related exposure.

CBN’s Broader Efforts in Financial Sector Oversight

This is not the first time the CBN has intervened in bank governance. In April 2021, it sacked the boards of First Bank of Nigeria and its holding company over non-compliant insider loans. Similarly, in 2009, the CBN removed the CEOs of five banks, including Oceanic Bank and Union Bank, due to reckless lending and poor risk management.

By forcing resignations and demanding immediate action on insider loans, the CBN is signaling a firm stance against financial impropriety. A senior banking executive, speaking anonymously, described the policy as a “necessary but aggressive” measure to restore investor confidence and limit systemic risks.

A Comparative Approach: How Other Central Banks Handle Insider Lending Abuses

The problem of insider lending is not unique to Nigeria. Across Africa and beyond, central banks have employed different strategies to curb abuse:

• South Africa: The South African Reserve Bank (SARB) enforces strict capital adequacy requirements and risk management standards, requiring banks to disclose insider-related lending quarterly. The failure of VBS Mutual Bank in 2018, due to fraud and insider loans, led to tighter scrutiny and criminal prosecutions.
• Ghana: In 2017–2019, Ghana’s central bank revoked the licenses of multiple banks, citing excessive insider lending as one of the key reasons. The collapse of UT Bank and Capital Bank triggered a banking sector reform that forced stricter oversight.
• Kenya: The Central Bank of Kenya (CBK) has enforced governance reforms, including capping the shareholding of directors in banks and limiting related-party transactions to prevent insider lending abuses. The failure of Chase Bank Kenya in 2016 was partly attributed to directors taking excessive loans.
• Nigeria’s Historical Approach: Nigeria has seen multiple waves of banking sector reforms, from the 2005 consolidation exercise, which forced banks to recapitalize, to the 2009 intervention that removed erring CEOs. This latest directive continues that tradition, reinforcing the CBN’s role as an active regulator.

What’s Next?

The impact of this directive will unfold in the coming months. Possible consequences include:

• Forced resignations and a reshuffling of bank boards.
• Increased loan recovery efforts, including asset seizures from defaulting directors.
• Potential stock market reactions, as investor confidence is tested.
• Stronger enforcement mechanisms, possibly leading to more regulatory oversight.

The CBN’s stance underscores the growing emphasis on governance and financial discipline. But how effectively banks comply, and how aggressively the CBN enforces these rules—will determine whether this move strengthens the financial system or simply triggers another wave of regulatory disputes.

Subscribe to Notifications