The Academic Staff Union of Universities (ASUU) has declared a two-week nationwide warning strike, accusing the Federal Government of failing to honour long-standing commitments on lecturers’ welfare, university funding, and institutional autonomy.
ASUU President, Professor Chris Piwuna, made the announcement on Sunday, October 12, 2025, during a press conference at the University of Abuja, stating that the government had made “no meaningful progress” to avert the planned industrial action.
According to Piwuna, the 14-day ultimatum issued on September 28, 2025, expired without any concrete response from authorities. Consequently, all ASUU branches nationwide have been instructed to begin a full withdrawal of services at midnight on Monday, October 13, 2025.
“The strike will be total and comprehensive,” he said, explaining that the decision followed resolutions reached at the union’s most recent National Executive Council (NEC) meeting.
Background to the Impasse
On September 28, ASUU issued a 14-day strike notice to the Federal Government, citing “neglect of the university system” and the government’s “consistent refusal” to address lingering issues.
“Despite our peaceful rallies and appeals held across campuses in August, nothing has changed,” the union said in a statement.
ASUU accused both the federal and state governments of showing little commitment to improving the education sector or addressing the welfare of university lecturers.
Speaking on Channels Television’s Morning Brief, Professor Piwuna criticised the government’s slow response to earlier warnings.
“We were given three weeks after our meeting in Sokoto, but the government never reached out again until the period expired,” he said.
“Our 2009 agreement, still under renegotiation after eight years, remains unresolved. Waiting until two days before a strike to appeal to us is unacceptable.”
He maintained that the union would proceed with the strike unless the government took urgent and concrete action before the ultimatum’s expiration — a demand that, once unmet, triggered the current industrial action.
ASUU Versus the FGN — The Issues at Stake
Why the Two-Week Warning Strike Is About More Than Salaries
The latest ASUU strike is not an isolated protest but a symptom of deeper structural tensions in Nigeria’s higher education system.
Behind the headlines are seven interlinked issues shaping the union’s confrontation with the Federal Government — from broken promises and underfunding to questions about sustainability and reform.
1. The 2009 ASUU–FGN Agreement and Broken Promises
At the core of ASUU’s grievances is the 2009 ASUU–FGN Agreement, a comprehensive framework that remains largely unimplemented 16 years later.
The agreement committed the government to periodic salary reviews, earned academic allowances, and sustainable infrastructure funding for universities.
Successive administrations have partially implemented or ignored various aspects. The 2025 renegotiation draft — completed after eight years of back-and-forth — remains unsigned.
ASUU insists these delays amount to a breach of collective bargaining and proof that the government is not serious about long-term higher-education reform.
2. Funding and Revitalisation of Public Universities
Nigeria’s public universities are chronically underfunded, with dilapidated facilities, overcrowded lecture halls, and limited research capacity.
While the 2009 agreement envisioned sustained revitalisation funds, government allocations have consistently fallen below UNESCO’s 15–20% benchmark for education spending.
Recent government efforts — including a ₦50 billion release for earned allowances and a ₦150 billion needs-assessment fund — are seen by ASUU as piecemeal and insufficient to reverse decades of neglect.
The union argues that only predictable, ring-fenced funding can end the culture of crisis management in higher education.
3. Arrears, Allowances, and Welfare
ASUU continues to demand payment of outstanding earned academic allowances, promotion arrears, and third-party deductions withheld by federal agencies.
Although the government has released partial payments, lecturers complain of erratic salary cycles and wage stagnation.
These welfare concerns, ASUU argues, are symptomatic of the disrespect and low prioritisation of academic labour, which in turn affects motivation and productivity within the system.
4. University Autonomy and the IPPIS Controversy
The adoption of the Integrated Personnel and Payroll Information System (IPPIS) remains one of ASUU’s most bitter disputes with the government.
The union contends that IPPIS violates university autonomy, forcing academics into a centralised payment structure designed for the civil service.
ASUU has proposed an alternative platform, UTAS (University Transparency and Accountability Solution), but government approval has been slow.
The union also cites federal interference in vice-chancellor appointments, promotion processes, and governing councils as additional evidence of political intrusion.
5. Trust Deficit and Breach of Collective Bargaining
Negotiations between ASUU and successive governments often follow a familiar pattern: meetings, promises, and long silences.
The union accuses authorities of treating collective bargaining as a tactical delay, fulfilling only the parts of agreements that attract short-term political gains.
This history of broken promises has produced what many analysts call a trust deficit, making future negotiations increasingly unproductive.
6. The Toll on Students and Nigeria’s Academic Future
Each ASUU strike leaves lasting scars on Nigeria’s higher education ecosystem.
Students lose months — sometimes years — to academic disruptions; parents incur extra housing and tuition costs; and the international credibility of Nigerian degrees continues to erode.
Education analysts warn that prolonged instability risks triggering a “systemic collapse” — where teaching, research, and global competitiveness fall below recovery thresholds.
7. Sustainability and Alternative Ways of Funding Higher Education
A crucial but under-discussed dimension of the ASUU–FGN crisis is how to sustainably fund higher education without recurring strikes.
While ASUU insists that education funding is the government’s constitutional duty, it has been largely resistant to alternative financing models such as public–private partnerships, education bonds, or tiered tuition systems.
The union fears these approaches would commercialise public education and exclude students from poor backgrounds.
However, reform advocates argue that Nigeria’s fiscal constraints make exclusive reliance on federal budgets unsustainable. They propose hybrid models combining:
-
Baseline government funding for equity,
-
Institutional autonomy to generate revenue through research, consultancy, and alumni endowments,
-
Private-sector collaboration on infrastructure and innovation.
So far, ASUU has not formally endorsed any alternative framework, though some branch leaders have shown openness to university-specific initiatives that safeguard access and equity.
Until consensus emerges on a credible funding model, Nigeria’s universities are likely to remain caught in cycles of underfunding, strikes, and piecemeal bailouts.
Government’s Position and Next Steps
The Federal Ministry of Education has appealed for calm, emphasising ongoing efforts to meet some of ASUU’s demands.
Minister Tunji Alausa cited the recent disbursement of ₦50 billion for allowances and the proposed ₦150 billion revitalisation fund as evidence of progress.
Yet ASUU leaders insist that such gestures fall short of the comprehensive reforms and timelines agreed in the 2009 pact.
Unless the government takes concrete action within the strike period, union officials warn, the two-week warning strike may escalate into an indefinite industrial action.
More Than a Strike — A Test of Credibility
“ASUU versus FGN” has become shorthand for the breakdown of trust, planning, and vision in Nigeria’s education governance.
For millions of students, parents, and lecturers, this strike is not just about wages — it is a test of credibility: whether Nigeria can sustain a modern university system or remain trapped in the politics of short-term fixes.
Until both sides find a shared path toward sustainable reform, each strike will be less a battle won or lost — and more a reminder of what’s at stake for Nigeria’s future.